Reviewer msema96
Best shoes I have ever worn, no more foot heel pain. I average 10k steps a day and my feet feel fresh at the end of the day😀
Reviewer Erika A Robertson
Felt a little too big in toe box for my feet
Reviewer squiggles50
My son is a heavy guy and finding shoes that are supportive and the right width is challenging. He stands on his feet all day so it's important he have comfortable support, and according to him, these shoes do the job very nicely. I plan to buy him another pair when I can.
Reviewer Dr Helson P Giraud
Comfortable. Easy to slip-on. The no laces is quick and easy to work with.
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer Victoria De Alba
These are great for narrow feet. My husband has trouble getting shoes that aren’t too wide and puma and adidas fit him well.
Reviewer Steve Ono
My daughter loves her Vans Slip on shoes!
She says they’re very comfortable!
Reviewer Valerie J Grimes
The shoes look great but they are just black with shiny black squares, not charcoal and black like in the picture. Also if you're half size shoe person , like me, order the half size up. Typically I am a size 7.5, so that's what I ordered. The shoes were nearly impossible to put on. It was a very tight squeeze and my toes were a little cramped. I am going to try to exchange it for a size eight. I suggest actually going to a store if you can. I wish I could have.
TL;DR round up your shoe size when ordering (7.5 -> 8)
Reviewer Hawaii
My new K-Swiss tennis shoes are awesome absolutely no complaints
Reviewer David Wickre
Never had vans before, thought I would give them a try. They are very well made and sturdy. The only reason I gave them 4 stars was the first day I wore them I got a blister on the back of my heel from them. Hopefully I can break them in with no more blisters! I really like the shoes so I hope they work out!
Show20-
200(Results:
790)
English
